Case Report

Suture Related Iatrogenic Bladder Stone

10.4274/jus.148

  • Hikmet Köseoğlu
  • Ramazan Yavuz Akman

J Urol Surg 2014;1(1):44-45

Iatrogenic suture materials within bladder cavity related to previous bladder surgeries or others with proximity to bladder may cause stone formation around themselves. This phenomenon has been well characterized with experimental animal studies. Though care related to choice of suture and technique of suturing is taken for, still such cases are reported after both urological and non-urological surgeries. In this report, such a case that had been operated for incontinence previously is presented for stone formation around the suture material within bladder cavity together with radiological examinations and endoscopical visualizations.

Keywords: Suture, iatrogenic, bladder, stone

Introduction

Stone formation due to suture materials within the bladder cavity has been well characterized with experimental animal studies (1,2,3). Though care related to choice of suture and technique of suturing is taken for bladder related surgeries and others with proximity to bladder, still such cases are reported after both urological (4,5) and non-urological surgeries, mostly incontinence surgeries (6,7,8,9,10,11). In this report, such a case is presented together with radiological examinations and endoscopical visualizations.


Case Presentation

A 75 year old lady was referred to urology clinics for recurrent urinary tract infections and intermittent hematuria episodes during last few years. She was complaining dysuria, hematuria and frequency on admission. Her medical history was uneventful except few gynecological operations. She had been performed total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy 25 years ago and cystocele repair 10 years ago. After diagnostic workup, the abdominal ultrasonography and plain abdominal X-ray scan revealed 25 mm bladder stone (Figure 1). Cystoscopy was performed and 25 mm bladder stone was visualized as hanging down at the left posterolateral side of the bladder (Figure 2). During litholopaxy, a suture material appeared within the body of the stone (Figure 2). The suture material was visualized as hanging down the bladder wall after removal of the stone around it (Figure 2). The suture material was removed endoscopically (Figure 2). After procedure, her follow up was uneventful and no further urinary tract infection was detected.


Discussion

Animal studies have well depicted that the most important property of suture materials leading to bladder stone formation is their non-absorbability (1,2,3). Either inappropriate suture technique leaving non-absorbable suture in bladder or replacement of suture material in to the bladder cavity due to tissue is the reason of iatrogenic suture within bladder. The suture material acts as a nidus for aggregation of crystals and eventually stone forms around it. Some urological and non-urological surgeries with proximity to bladder have been reported to have such a complication (4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11). Non-urological surgeries are mostly incontinence surgeries including Marshall-Marchetti-Krantz operation, Burch colposuspension, laparoscopic colposuspension and even tension free vaginal tape procedure (6,7,8,9,10). In most of the procedures, as in our case, the suture materials were non-absorbable (4,6,7,8,9,10,11). However, iatrogenic bladder stone formation due to absorbable suture has also been reported after a urological surgery (5). 

The cases mostly had lower urinary tract symptoms and/or hematuria after one to fourteen years of their related surgeries (5,6,7,8,9,10,11). However, it might be asymptomatic and diagnosed in postmortem study though huge bladder stone with size of 9x1 cm (4). 

The treatment modalities mainly consist of endoscopical removal of stone and suture material as in our case.

Conflicts of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest.


1. Kaminski JM, Katz AR, Woodward SC. Urinary bladder calculus formation on sutures in rabbits, cats and dogs. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1978;146:353-357.
2. Morris MC, Baquero A, Redovan E, Mahoney E, Bannett AD. Urolithiasis on absorbable and non–absorbable suture materials in the rabbit bladder. J Urol 1986;135:602-603.
3. Hanke PR, Timm P, Falk G, Kramer W. Behavior of different suture materials in the urinary bladder of the rabbit with special reference to wound healing, epithelization and crystallization. Urol Int 1994;52:26-33.
4. Williams DJ. Uric acid bladder stone associated with a foreign body. Postgrad Med J 1986;62:495.
5. Cursio R, Choquenet C. Iatrogenic bladder stone formation on absorbable suture 3-years after radical prostatectomy. Minerva Urol Nefrol 2002;54:127-128.
6. Zderic SA, Burros HM, Hanno PM, Dudas N, Whitmore KE. Bladder calculi in women after urethrovesical suspension. J Urol 1988;139:1047-1048.
7. Huang WC, Yang JM. Sonographic appearance of a bladder calculus secondary to a suture from a bladder neck suspension. J Ultrasound Med 2002;21:1303-1305.
8. Arunkalaivanan AS, Smith AR. Bladder calculus after laparoscopic colposuspension. J Obstet Gynaecol 2002;22:101.
9. Manikandan R, Pritchard S, Brown SC. An unusual complication of Burch colposuspension. Int J Urol 2004;11:669-670.
10. Tzortzis V, Mitsogiannis IC, Moutzouris G, Aravantinos E, Anagnostou T, Gravas S, Melekos MD. Bladder stone formation after a tension–free vaginal tape procedure: report on two cases. Urol Int 2007;79:181-182.
11. Lu CM. Intravesical stone formation several years after hysterectomy: a case report. J Med Case Rep 2013;7:230.